Archive for the ‘Tax Planning’ Category

Alternatives to 401K retirement plans

By: Steve A Porter, CPA, CMA

If you have looked at retirement plans for you and your employees, it’s a sure bet that you are familiar with 401K plans. Chances are you already have one. Since they were introduced in the 80’s, there has been a literal explosion of these type plans.

Although they are very popular, they are heavily regulated by the DOL, and sometimes the rules as mandated by the government do not allow you the flexibility you want in rewarding your top performers. The problem usually arises when the plan becomes ‘top heavy’, ie: highly compensated employees receive a greater share of benefit than allowed by the regulations.

Fortunately there are other options available, and one of the most common involves ‘carving out’ highly compensated employees and allowing them to participate in a ‘non-qualified’ style plan.

Other Options: Non-Qualified Plans

A non-qualified plan can replace the existing plan, or exist alongside it. Employees can participate in both plans if the employer allows it. In reviewing what’s out there for these type plans, I found they have increased in popularity in recent years, and they also are very varied and come in many forms. Note that the general recommendation (not necessarily a requirement) is that 15% of the employees be in this plan. It is not meant to be a general retirement fund for all employees. It is a special plan for management and/or upper-tier executives.

The two broad categories are Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (SERPS) and Non Qualified Deferred Compensation (NQDC).

SERPS are usually in the form of defined benefit plans where the employer foots the bill for a retirement/life insurance payout. NQDCs are contribution plans where employees defer a portion of their salary, and employers provide matching contributions.

Top Hat Plans is the common term for these NQDC style plans. They are very popular because they can be designed and set up to look and feel like (to the participant, at least) a 401K plan. However, there are no testing requirements, no non-discrimination rules, no fiduciary responsibility on administrators, no annual filing, no audits, and they are very flexible as far as pre-funding and payouts are concerned. Also, there are no limits on contributions. Most employers do set limits, but the limit is determined by the employer, not the government.

The structure of the plan is very different from a 401K plan, however. The plan is “unfunded.” This term is misleading because it does not mean the plan has no funds, only that the participant has no specific claim to the fund assets other than that of a general creditor. The assets in the funds are essentially arrangements made by the employer to finance the payout. There is no requirement for this financing (pre-funding), but that lack of financial security adds significant risk to participants. Administrative fees are very high if you do not provide financing for the payout.

Essentially, the participant has a legally binding contract with the employer that he/she will be paid “X” amount of money on a certain date depending on certain events. The payout can be tied to contributions made by employer and employee and/or fund earnings. You can even have a vesting schedule as long as the employee understands he/she does not own anything other than promise by the employer backed up by a contractual obligation. Note that this contract is not administered or regulated by the DOL as in the case of a 401K plan. It is simply a standard contractual obligation bound by standard contract law.

The assets of the fund are owned by the employer. As such, they are vulnerable if the company files bankruptcy. Also, any earnings on the funds are taxable to the company. That’s why most companies use Company Owned Life Insurance (COLIs) as the pre-funding asset. Of course mutual funds and similar investments can be used.

To give employees a little more security, most of these plans use a “Rabbi Trust.” which acts to set aside the fund assets in a special type of trust. These trusts offer no protection from involuntary liquidations such as bankruptcy, however. Also, Rabbi Trusts are required if participants make pre-tax deferrals.

Probably the biggest negative aspect of these type funds is that the employer does not get a tax deduction for contributions to the fund since the company retains ownership and control of the contributions. These tax savings over the years are VERY significant. Forfeiting that tax deduction is costly, however, you do get to deduct employer contributions it when they become taxable to the employee, usually through payout.

These type funds do provide a very good tax shelter for participants, however. And a C-Corp actually has a small advantage over pass though entities since any earnings on the plan are not passed directly to the owner.

If you are interested in these style plans, I would recommend getting proposals from several companies. The big players like Principal or Fidelity can help you learn about these type plans, and offer you quotes and advice on getting set up.

Although these plans have very relaxed rules and are very flexible, they are complicated financial arrangements, and there are several “gotchas” if not done correctly.

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Should I Change My C-Corporation to an S-Corp?

Life used to be simple. You only had two or three channels on your television, your AM radio DJ selected your music for you, and there was no such thing as texting.

And if you started a business, you either incorporated, or you did not.

Most people who did go into business decided it best to form a corporation, however; The main reason being the legal protection granted with a separate entity which protects business owner’s personal assets.

The following assumes you already are set up as a C-Corp and you are thinking about converting. If you are not sure what type entity you have, take a look at your last tax return. If you filed a federal form 1120 (not a 1120-S), you are a C-Corp, and converting to an S-Corp might be a benefit to you, so please keep reading!

What are my options?

These days, instead of the traditional C-Corporation, a business has can choose, among other things, to be an S-Corporation or a Limited Liability Company (LLC). The advantage of these style entities is that they are pass through entities. This means that, like a sole proprietorship, the earnings of the company become part of the owner’s income, and all taxes are paid by the shareholder thus avoiding entirely corporate level taxation. Also, distributions, as opposed to dividends, are paid to the shareholder and unlike dividends, distributions are not taxable.

S-Corps (aka Subchapter S corporations) have been around for quite some time, but they became very popular in the 1980’s when personal tax rates dropped below corporate rates. The US economy also began to change, and we saw a surge in new small business startups which is the type business most suited for Subchapter S status. Note too, it was in that time that the other popular entity for small businesses became available: LLCs.

There are still a number of C-corps around, however. Many of them would benefit from filing as an S-Corp. Given the popularity and advantages of this type entity, a C-Corp owner might be wondering if it would pay to convert to an S-Corp. The good news is that it is not too hard to do, but the bad news is that it might not be feasible from a cost/benefit perspective.

Generally speaking, it is not a good idea to convert a C-Corp to an LLC since this involves recognizing a gain on the assets of the company and creating taxes on both the gain and the cash generated when distributed to the owner(s). But changing to an S-Corp is doable, and may offer several advantages.

Why change my C-Corp to an S Corp?

Probably the main reason people like S-Corporations is the pass through method of taxation. In a traditional corporation, the profits are taxed at the corporate level, and distributions from earnings are made via dividend. This means both the corporation and the shareholder must pay taxes. And in the case of dividends, there is actually double taxation

Also most people pay a lower amount of payroll taxes in an S-Corporation. As long as your compensation is reasonable, you can pay yourself a modest salary and take the remaining earnings out as a distribution. Since distributions are not subject to FICA/Medicare and other payroll taxes, you will benefit from less taxes.

Note that changing from “C” to “S” does change your corporate legal entity. You are still a corporation, and you not have to re-incorporate, and your original articles of incorporation apply. It is a good idea to amend them, however. Also, documenting the change in the minutes of your corporation’s board meeting is highly recommended. You’ll need to file the appropriate forms with the IRS. Your CPA should be able to handle that for you.

What is the downside?

Do you value your inventory using the LIFO method? Is so, you will be subject to LIFO recapture tax, and in my experience this can be a deal breaker. Essentially, the difference in your LIFO and FIFO value (this amount is called the LIFO Reserve) become a taxable income.

Fortunately, the income is taxed over four years, so if your LIFO reserve is $600,000.00, your corporation will pay taxes on $150,000.00 for four years. At 34% this is $51,000.00 per year. Is it worth it? For many, the answer is no.

If you do not use LIFO, the other item that might cause problems are built-in gains. Thanks to recent tax incentives, many businesses have assets that have a very low basis. This comes about by using section 179 expense options, and more recently, bonus depreciation. This causes the tax basis to be well below the fair market value in most cases, and this difference must be calculated and presented on the tax return of the new S-Corp.

The good news here is that you do not pay taxes on this gain until it is sold. If it is sold during the holding period (currently 10 years), the gain is taxed at the corporate rate of 35%, and is taxed separate from other gains and losses generated by the new S-Corp. The thrust of the built in gains regulations is to keep a C-Corp from converting to a S-Corp, and then immediately selling off assets to take advantage of lower tax rates in the new S-Corp.

Other Issues

Other problems relate to business structure. For example, you can only have one class of stock. Also, you can only have 100 shareholders. For most small businesses however, these are not problems.

Another problem might arise if your current corporation uses a fiscal year, ie; a year that does not end December 31. S-Corps are generally required to use a calendar year unless it can be shown that the majority of the owners use a fiscal year. When converting to an S-Corp, most people simply convert to a calendar year. If a fiscal year is crucial to your business operations, this might preclude you from converting to an S-Corp

So, should you change your C-Corp to an S-Corp? The short answer: it depends. For many small businesses, this is an ideal move, but every business and every situation is different. Your CPA is a good place to start if you are considering this change.

Questions? Please use the CONTACT FORM to get further information, and thanks for reading!

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Constructive Dividends: Tax Trap for Small C Corps

If you own a small business, and you started operations in the last 20 years or so, chances are you are an “S Corporation”, or an “LLC” (Limited Liability Company). These forms of entities are popular because they are “pass through” entities, which simply means profits earned by the company are passed to the owners for tax purposes avoiding corporate level taxation altogether. (more…)

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Selling Your Business – A Tool To Reduce Capital Gains Taxes

Editor’s Note: The IRS and Treasury Department have enacted regulations that  severely limit the effectiveness and use of private annuity trusts as an income  and estate planning strategy. The regulation covers all private annuity  trusts created after October 18, 2006. All trusts created before this date are  grandfathered and will continue to receive the tax benefits of the  trust.

The biggest change is the elimination of the deferral of  capital gains taxes on all future private annuities. Without that feature,  many individuals will be forced to look at other strategies to determine what  would be best for their situations. Therefore, before you implement any strategy  discussed in this article, be sure to consult a legal and tax professional.

“I would rather expire at my desk than to sell my business and pay Uncle Sam one dime in taxes.” How many owners that have paid their fair share of taxes for twenty years of building their business feel this way? The tax bite is the single biggest factor in an owner’s reluctance to sell his/her company.

I have previously written articles discussing various aspects of transaction structures to minimize taxes. As a result, I am often contacted by a panicked seller that is a week from closing his business sale as he looks in disbelief at his accountant’s spreadsheet detailing the tax burden of his impending sale. (more…)

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

|